You didn't understand. I meant I broke off one at least the size of the one at the picture. I didn't mean the huge monster at harvey gap. Meaning the fish I broke off at connected lakes was NOT 16 pounds, I'm thinking it was probably about 8lbs, could've been up to about 10. I never got a long look at it.Ed Marcol said:TFB-In one sentence you talk about breaking off a fish at connected lakes that was at least 16 lbs. Then a few sentences later you talk about a rumor of a 14 lb'er at connected lakes but you doubt it. Which is it?
I doubt it some too, but I seem to remember reading it somewhere. It may have been heresay, it was I believe what, 5 years ago?wmccree said:I would be surprised if there was a 14 or 16 lb bass caught in CO. Until I see the archive from a "verifiable" source I have to cry BS. I would love to see it though, but we need to face the facts. Conditions just aren't right for us to be pulling lunkers out like that. Also, eaten or not, there would be pictures all over the place of it. If anyone can tell me the "paper" that it was in I'll do the research to prove myself wrong....but it won't happen