This question has come up to me before, and we all came up to the same conclusion. It is a fish attractant, has been known for a long time. My grandfather actually brought it up to me for the first time years ago. But the question is, with all of the other liquid fish attractants that are out there, and with those being safe to the environment, why would you use a pollutant as a fish attractant? Sure its only a small amount every now and again, but with as many fisherman as we have in the state / nation, there is a lot of "little amounts" hitting the water. And yes, we may put "worse" things in the water, but that's no excuse to add to our own negligance by adding to our list of pollutants.
IMO no good at all. Im sure the masses would agree. Try to switch to an attractant that is safe to the environment, and leave the WD40 in the garage. I happen to know for a fact that the fish will bite without it.
IMO no good at all. Im sure the masses would agree. Try to switch to an attractant that is safe to the environment, and leave the WD40 in the garage. I happen to know for a fact that the fish will bite without it.